In June 2023, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed a sweeping enforcement action against Binance Holdings, its U.S. affiliate BAM Trading, BAM Management, and founder Changpeng Zhao (CZ), alleging multiple violations of federal securities laws. The SEC’s complaint argues that Binance operated unregistered securities exchanges, broker-dealers, and clearing agencies serving U.S. customers and conducted unregistered offers and sales of crypto asset securities, including through products such as BNB, BUSD, BNB Vault, Simple Earn, and Binance.US staking. As part of the case, the SEC explicitly identified a set of widely traded tokens as “crypto asset securities.” According to the complaint and subsequent legal analysis, the agency alleged that BNB and BUSD (Binance’s native token and stablecoin) are securities, and that Binance also facilitated trading in additional assets it characterizes as securities: Solana (SOL), Cardano (ADA), Polygon (MATIC), Filecoin (FIL), Cosmos (ATOM), The Sandbox (SAND), Decentraland (MANA), Algorand (ALGO), Axie Infinity (AXS), and COTI. These designations do not represent a final legal determination by a court, but they mark a significant escalation of the SEC’s “regulation by enforcement” approach by formally naming major layer-1s, gaming tokens, and other large-cap assets as securities in a federal complaint. The move has broad implications for exchanges, token issuers, and U.S. market structure. By treating these tokens as securities, the SEC contends that platforms listing or offering them, and staking or yield products tied to them, may fall under securities regulation and require registration or exemptions. It also intensifies the policy debate and legal uncertainty around how U.S. law classifies different types of digital assets, especially given that other regulators, such as the CFTC, have described several major cryptocurrencies and stablecoins as commodities rather than securities. Subsequent developments, including an SEC amendment dropping some third‑party token security allegations in the Binance case, indicate that the precise regulatory status of many of these assets remains unsettled and subject to ongoing litigation and policy shifts.

AI-generated background, compiled from web sources — not editorial content.

More coverage

Explore the topic

More on Binance

Comments