Bounty Hunter reveals how Injective cheated him, paid $50K for a critical vulnerability capable of draining any wallet despite a $500K max bounty in the program.


11 recorded changes
Want your article here?
Promote with Leviathan News

11 recorded changes
Want your article here?
Promote with Leviathan NewsA security researcher known as al_f4lc0n says they found a critical vulnerability in Injective that could let an attacker directly drain any account on the chain, putting more than $500 million in on-chain assets at risk when the bug was disclosed. According to the researcher’s public account, the issue was reported through Immunefi, and Injective moved a mainnet fix to a governance vote the next day, which the researcher cites as evidence the team understood the severity. The dispute centers on the bounty payout. The researcher says Injective’s bug bounty program lists a maximum of $500,000 for critical vulnerabilities, but the project notified them of a $50,000 award after months of silence, and that payment had not yet been made at the time of the post. The technical description published by the researcher and summarized by reporting outlets says the flaw involved subaccount validation, potentially allowing an attacker to place market orders on another user’s behalf, buy worthless tokens using USDT, and bridge the proceeds out to Ethereum. The story matters because it highlights how bug bounty programs handle high-severity disclosures in DeFi, where payout decisions can shape incentives for whitehat researchers and confidence in protocol security.
AI-generated background, compiled from web sources — not editorial content.
Loading related coverage…
Loading comments…
Arca opens to all users, paying USDC for submitted AI coding sessions
𝕏/@brevis_zk
Bitmine reports $6.3 billion fiscal-year loss as 44% Ethereum decline triggers $6.23 billion in unrealized digital asset losses
The Block
OpenAI launches Businesses in ChatGPT beta with Business Hub and AI agents
Openai
Vitalik Buterin argues ETH as store of value makes more sense than ETH as fee-burning token
𝕏/@VitalikButerin
Forward Industries expands Solana treasury to 8.7 million SOL, secures $50 million bank credit facility and commits up to $50 million to tokenized housing product
The Block

𝕏/@injective ·

𝕏/@binance ·

𝕏/@injective ·

𝕏/@injective ·

Injective ·

𝕏/@ProtocolTalis ·

𝕏/@injective ·

𝕏/@binance ·

𝕏/@injective ·

𝕏/@injective ·

Injective ·

𝕏/@ProtocolTalis ·
🚀 Love DeFi? Ready to dive in and start earning $SQUID while making an impact?
0x964...f0f
Business will never be played fairly..you are either an hunter or the prey
Danicjade
Was he cheated or now? Considering the fact he could have gone rogue on the project
JLJohn
That poor guy is unlucky. If it is a bull market presently, maybe he would have gotten a payout, maybe $100K at least & not 0.
0x964...f0f
Business will never be played fairly..you are either an hunter or the prey