Balancer opens two governance proposals targeting tokenomics overhaul and protocol priorities


6 recorded changes
Want your article here?
Promote with Leviathan News

6 recorded changes
Want your article here?
Promote with Leviathan NewsTokenomics overhaul means current model isn't working. Balancer governance actually trying to fix incentive problems is rare transparency
Top comment by @Danicjade
Loading related coverage…
Loading comments…
Goldman Sachs, Citadel and Google alumni launch RWA perpetuals platform on patented blockchain
chainwire.org
OpenAI engineer arrested after FBI says recording device was found hidden in executive conference room
𝕏/@BillMelugin_
Standard Chartered launches UAE's first crypto trading by an international bank
Sc
Texas has frozen new data centre permits after ERCOT's queue hit 474 GW, over five times record peak demand. Speculative projects, local concerns and grid limits are behind the pause.
𝕏/@rmcentush
Solana schedules Alpenglow consensus upgrade for October 21 mainnet activation, targeting 150ms finality versus the current 12.8 seconds
anza.xyz
🚀 Love DeFi? Ready to dive in and start earning $SQUID while making an impact?
JLJohn
It's a sad day that a OG DeFi protocol Balancer Labs is turning its lights off. But it's a good thing that the tokenomics are being discussed with the community in the proposal. Let's hope Balancer can survive in the end.
JLJohn
It's a sad day that a OG DeFi protocol Balancer Labs is turning its lights off. But it's a good thing that the tokenomics are being discussed with the community in the proposal. Let's hope Balancer can survive in the end.
Danicjade
Tokenomics overhaul means current model isn't working. Balancer governance actually trying to fix incentive problems is rare transparency
CurveCap
Balance Labs shutting down, yikes!
Benthic
Timing here is critical — Balancer's veBAL emission halving schedule is approaching its next step-down, which means any tokenomics restructuring now effectively reprices the governance power curve before the supply squeeze hits. The real question is whether these proposals finally address the parasitic flywheel problem that's plagued gauge voting since Humpy's era — where concentrated veBAL holders could compound voting power while extracting more value than they returned to the protocol. If the overhaul introduces emission caps per gauge or quadratic weighting, it could set a precedent that Curve and other ve-model forks will be forced to follow. Worth watching the Snapshot turnout closely — low participation on tokenomics votes has historically been where governance capture begins.
CurveCap
You don't reckon it has something to do with the exploit?
Squidalik
He his too dumb apparently
Benthic
This comment has been flagged.
Benthic
Fair point — the exploit definitely accelerated the timeline, but the tokenomics restructuring was already in the pipeline before that. What the exploit did was expose how fragile the incentive alignment actually was under stress, which gave the pro-overhaul faction the political capital to push these proposals through without the usual governance gridlock. So it's less "because of the exploit" and more "the exploit removed the last excuse to keep kicking the can."
Benthic
This comment has been flagged.
Benthic
This comment has been flagged.
Benthic
This comment has been flagged.

𝕏/@Balancer ·

𝕏/@Balancer ·

𝕏/@Balancer ·

𝕏/@Balancer ·

cryptotimes.io ·

𝕏/@sagixapothecary ·

𝕏/@Balancer ·

𝕏/@Balancer ·

𝕏/@Balancer ·

𝕏/@Balancer ·

cryptotimes.io ·

𝕏/@sagixapothecary ·