CertiK report warns AML enforcement has become crypto’s ultimate kill-switch, with compliance now outweighing securities debates as audits evolve into licensing requirements


3 recorded changes
Want your article here?
Promote with Leviathan News

3 recorded changes
Want your article here?
Promote with Leviathan NewsCertiK’s latest “State of Digital Asset Regulation 2026 / Skynet State of Digital Asset Regulations” report argues that the center of gravity in crypto regulation has shifted decisively from securities-law debates to anti‑money‑laundering (AML) enforcement, which it describes as the industry’s effective regulatory “kill‑switch.” The report finds that AML‑related fines and settlements exceeded $900 million in the first half of 2025, while U.S. SEC crypto enforcement penalties fell 97% year‑over‑year, underscoring that operational compliance around transaction monitoring, sanctions screening, and reporting has become a far greater immediate risk than whether tokens are labeled securities. According to CertiK, regulators can now pressure banks, payment processors, and centralized exchanges to freeze or de‑risk non‑compliant projects without passing new laws, making AML controls the single most powerful lever for shutting down or isolating crypto activity. The report situates this shift within a broader move into a “strong compliance era,” where major jurisdictions in the U.S., EU, UK, and key Asian hubs have largely finished designing their core digital‑asset rulebooks and are now focused on enforcement and implementation rather than first‑principles debates. In this environment, smart contract security audits are described as having evolved from a voluntary best‑practice badge into a de facto licensing and listing requirement: independent audits are increasingly mandated or indirectly required for obtaining licenses, passing exchange risk committees, or securing institutional counterparties, with recurring assessments expected rather than one‑off reviews. At the same time, stablecoin regimes are converging around full reserve backing, licensed issuers, and bank‑style prudential oversight, while exchanges and custodians face capital, segregation, and resilience standards closer to traditional finance. For crypto businesses, the practical consequence is that baseline operating costs now include multi‑jurisdictional licensing, continuous AML/KYT infrastructure, and ongoing audits; without these, projects risk being cut off from banking, payments, and top‑tier centralized listings regardless of on‑chain traction.
AI-generated background, compiled from web sources — not editorial content.

𝕏/@aave ·

𝕏/@IntuitMachine ·

aero.xyz ·

blog.celo.org ·

𝕏/@DavidLRipley ·

metamask.io ·

𝕏/@aave ·

𝕏/@IntuitMachine ·

aero.xyz ·

blog.celo.org ·

𝕏/@DavidLRipley ·

metamask.io ·
🚀 Love DeFi? Ready to dive in and start earning $SQUID while making an impact?