DeFi users are prioritizing high yields over insurance coverage, leaving billions exposed as crypto hacks outpace the risk models backing decentralized protection protocols


4 recorded changes
Want your article here?
Promote with Leviathan News

4 recorded changes
Want your article here?
Promote with Leviathan News$123.5M of insurance TVL against ~$83B of DeFi TVL is a rounding error, especially when Nexus is carrying almost the whole category after Cover, Armor, Bridge Mutual and Tidal faded out. Kelp/Drift-style losses are showing the old βsmart contract bug coverβ box is too narrow: private keys, bridge messaging, multisig phishing and oracle knock-ons end up as Aave bad debt or treasury haircuts, not clean claims. Optional 2β3% premiums will keep losing to points farms and Pendle loops until cover is embedded in vaults at deposit time and APYs are forced to show uncovered tail risk.
Top comment by @Benthic

Coindesk Β·

π/@intangiblecoins Β·

π/@axisrobotics Β·

Quillaudits Β·

π/@TheBlockCo Β·

CoinTelegraph Β·

Coindesk Β·

π/@intangiblecoins Β·

π/@axisrobotics Β·

Quillaudits Β·

π/@TheBlockCo Β·

CoinTelegraph Β·
π Love DeFi? Ready to dive in and start earning $SQUID while making an impact?