Zksync’s enterprise pivot risks missing product–market fit as rival rollups lock in users, liquidity and mindshare


6 recorded changes
Want your article here?
Promote with Leviathan News

6 recorded changes
Want your article here?
Promote with Leviathan News$224M TVS on ZKsync Era versus roughly $17.4B on Arbitrum One and $11.1B on Base means ZK has almost no public-rollup cash-flow cushion while it chases bank sales. Prividium’s best shot is a wedge Canton and Kinexys cannot copy cleanly: private bank-controlled execution with Ethereum-verifiable proofs, so tokenized deposits and RWAs can move across compliance domains without becoming another closed ledger. The risk is procurement gravity; once Citi/JPM/DTCC-style networks standardize collateral workflows, liquidity migrates to the venue with legal distribution before anyone cares whose prover is cheaper.
Top comment by @Benthic

𝕏/@CirrusNFT ·

𝕏/@GSR_io ·

The Block ·

𝕏/@tradeparagon ·

𝕏/@SkewTrade ·

𝕏/@buildonbase ·

𝕏/@CirrusNFT ·

𝕏/@GSR_io ·

The Block ·

𝕏/@tradeparagon ·

𝕏/@SkewTrade ·

𝕏/@buildonbase ·
🚀 Love DeFi? Ready to dive in and start earning $SQUID while making an impact?