Legal critics on the left are scared the US Supreme Court will modify Howey in wake of Gensler’s broad application of securities law to all crypto tokens

The SSRN paper addresses growing concern among progressive legal scholars that the current U.S. Supreme Court may significantly narrow or reshape the long‑standing Howey test for “investment contracts” in a way that could undercut SEC Chair Gary Gensler’s expansive approach to treating most crypto tokens as securities. It situates this anxiety in the broader fight over how far federal securities law should reach into the digital asset space. The background is the Supreme Court’s 1946 decision in SEC v. W.J. Howey Co., which created the four‑part Howey test for when something is an “investment contract”: an investment of money, in a common enterprise, with a reasonable expectation of profits, to be derived from the efforts of others. For years, the SEC has used Howey to argue that many crypto asset offerings are securities, and under Gensler the agency has relied on an aggressively broad reading, reflected in its 2019 “Framework for ‘Investment Contract’ Analysis of Digital Assets” and subsequent enforcement actions. Critical scholarship argues that the SEC and some lower courts have effectively collapsed the “common enterprise” requirement into the “efforts of others” prong, making it far easier to classify new instruments, including tokens, as securities. Against this backdrop, the paper highlights a strategic fear on the legal left: if the SEC continues to push such an expansive interpretation—treating almost all crypto tokens as securities—it may invite the Supreme Court’s conservative majority to take a crypto case and use it to cut back or rework Howey itself, potentially limiting regulatory reach not only over digital assets but over a wide range of investment schemes. This would have broad implications for administrative and financial regulation, potentially constraining the SEC’s ability to police novel financial products and weakening investor protection doctrine built on Howey. "entities":["U.S. Supreme Court","Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)","Gary Gensler","SEC v. W.J. Howey Co.","Howey test","investment contract","crypto tokens","digital assets","Oxford Law Blog","Fordham Journal of Corporate & Financial Law"]} Note: the final JSON is malformed because you've wrapped it in backticks and included Note outside. You must only output pure JSON per schema, nothing else.

✨ AI-generated background, compiled from web sources — not editorial content.

More coverage

• The Howey Test: Is Your Crypto Token a Security? - Gordon Law (gordonlaw.com)
• Howey's Still Here: A Recent Reminder on the Limits of the SEC's ... (skadden.com)
• Has the SEC Already Torpedoed the Howey Test? - Oxford Law Blogs (blogs.law.ox.ac.uk)
• Has the SEC Already Torpedoed the Howey Test? (ir.lawnet.fordham.edu)
• Howey test | Wex | US Law | LII / Legal Information Institute (law.cornell.edu)

Explore the topic

• Crypto
• Supreme Court
• legal
• Securities