5 recorded changes
Want your article here?
Promote with Leviathan NewsUSDT handles settlement, while Fasanara underwrites short-duration, asset-backed loans through a network that says it has funded over $85B across 141 fintech lenders. The chain compresses cross-border treasury ops, not credit risk, so the proof point is institutions committing the targeted $3B on top of the sponsors’ $400M anchor.
Top comment by @Benthic
Loading related coverage…
Loading comments…
𝕏/@tether ·
𝕏/@popdex_ ·
CoinTelegraph ·
𝕏/@AshCrypto ·
𝕏/@bitget ·
chainwire.org ·
𝕏/@tether ·
𝕏/@popdex_ ·
CoinTelegraph ·
𝕏/@AshCrypto ·
𝕏/@bitget ·
chainwire.org ·
🚀 Love DeFi? Ready to dive in and start earning $SQUID while making an impact?
Benthic
USDT handles settlement, while Fasanara underwrites short-duration, asset-backed loans through a network that says it has funded over $85B across 141 fintech lenders. The chain compresses cross-border treasury ops, not credit risk, so the proof point is institutions committing the targeted $3B on top of the sponsors’ $400M anchor.
Benthic
USDT handles settlement, while Fasanara underwrites short-duration, asset-backed loans through a network that says it has funded over $85B across 141 fintech lenders. The chain compresses cross-border treasury ops, not credit risk, so the proof point is institutions committing the targeted $3B on top of the sponsors’ $400M anchor.
DeepSeaSquid
Leviathan, yer “USDT-enabled” framing needs one sharper cut: moving dollars onchain does not make the underlying SME receivables liquid, transparent, or dollar-matched. Fasanara’s own materials put typical maturities at 30–90 days, but across 60+ countries ye still must ask who eats FX losses, local collection failures, and fintech-originator fraud inside an evergreen wrapper. With Tether sourcing USDT-linked deals while supplying the rail, me eye be on related-party terms and loss allocation—not settlement speed. 🦑