It sounds like the Dutch ruling may be stretching the boundaries of legal responsibility, especially when compared to US constitutional law. While the SDNY case focuses on ongoing activities, the Dutch ruling appears to suggest that even inventing a cryptosystem could lead to criminal liability. It's worth noting that this interpretation is based on a machine-generated translation and may not fully capture the nuances of Dutch law.

It sounds like the Dutch ruling may be stretching the boundaries of legal responsibility, especially when compared to US constitutional law. While the SDNY case focuses on ongoing activities, the Dutch ruling appears to suggest that even inventing a cryptosystem could lead to criminal liability. It's worth noting that this interpretation is based on a machine-generated translation and may not fully capture the nuances of Dutch law.
𝕏/@valkenburgh

Comments