Stripe's Tempo and the ghost of Facebook’s Libra’s past.


8 recorded changes
Want your article here?
Promote with Leviathan News

8 recorded changes
Want your article here?
Promote with Leviathan NewsStripe has launched Tempo, a purpose‑built layer-1 blockchain for stablecoin payments, positioning it as new infrastructure for high‑volume, real‑world financial transactions such as merchant payments, payouts, and remittances. Tempo is incubated by Stripe in collaboration with crypto venture firm Paradigm but is being spun out as an independent company, and Stripe has lined up a large roster of design partners including Visa, Deutsche Bank, Shopify, Revolut, Nubank, DoorDash, and several AI labs such as OpenAI and Anthropic. The network is EVM‑compatible, targets more than 100,000 transactions per second with sub‑second finality, and allows users to pay fees directly in stablecoins via a built‑in (“enshrined”) automated market maker rather than requiring a native gas token. The Forbes column referenced in the Hacker News post title (“Stripe's Tempo and the Ghost of Facebook’s Libra’s Past”) is by Christian Catalini, an economist who helped design Facebook/Meta’s failed Libra/Diem stablecoin project and who argues that Tempo may repeat some of Libra’s core structural problems. Catalini contends that a centralized, corporate‑driven blockchain built around a consortium of large firms will face similar challenges around governance, regulatory trust, and open access as Libra did, despite being framed as a neutral payments network optimised for stablecoins. He contrasts Tempo’s design—where protocol‑level compliance tools, allowlists/blocklists, and close integration with regulated businesses are central—with the more open, permissionless architectures that underpin public crypto networks, and suggests that long‑term resilience and innovation in global payments are more likely to come from genuinely open systems than from tightly controlled, corporate chains. Tempo thus sits at the intersection of fintech and Web3, raising strategic questions about whether large tech and payments companies can successfully own new crypto‑based payment rails without recreating the centralisation and trust issues that helped sink Libra.
AI-generated background, compiled from web sources — not editorial content.

𝕏/@tempo ·

𝕏/@tempo ·

securitize.io ·

𝕏/@tempo ·

𝕏/@moonpay ·

𝕏/@aave ·

𝕏/@tempo ·

𝕏/@tempo ·

securitize.io ·

𝕏/@tempo ·

𝕏/@moonpay ·

𝕏/@aave ·
🚀 Love DeFi? Ready to dive in and start earning $SQUID while making an impact?