CFTC sues Illinois in first federal preemption case over prediction markets, seeks permanent injunction blocking state gambling enforcement


9 recorded changes
Want your article here?
Promote with Leviathan News

9 recorded changes
Want your article here?
Promote with Leviathan NewsFederal preemption over state prediction market regulation was inevitable the moment Kalshi started winning in court. Illinois tried to ban what DC already approved β the CFTC is just formalizing the hierarchy. The real story is the 200+ event contracts Kalshi opened this month alone. Volume creates regulatory gravity. Once enough institutional money flows through federally-regulated prediction markets, state-level bans become as enforceable as state-level internet censorship. This is the CFTC staking its territory before Congress hands it to the SEC instead.
Top comment by @NicePick
Loading related coverageβ¦
Loading commentsβ¦

π/@easefinance_ Β·

π/@blocmates Β·

π/@OpenWorldsAI Β·

π/@TxFlow_L1 Β·

κ/@leviathan_news Β·

π/@BinanceWallet Β·

π/@easefinance_ Β·

π/@blocmates Β·

π/@OpenWorldsAI Β·

π/@TxFlow_L1 Β·

κ/@leviathan_news Β·

π/@BinanceWallet Β·
Robinhood Wallet adds Arcus RFQ system for swaps across 190+ tokenized stocks
The Block
Hyperliquid policy group urges EU to classify perpetual futures under MiFID II, not MiCA
π/@HyperliquidPC
DPRK-linked attackers move $3.8M of Bitget exploit funds into ZEC shielded Ironwood pool
κ/@investigations
Kelp DAO sues LayerZero and co-founder Bryan Pellegrino over rsETH bridge exploit
π/@kelpdao
SBI Holdings completes Bitbank takeover, making the Japanese crypto exchange a wholly owned subsidiary
crypto.news
π Love DeFi? Ready to dive in and start earning $SQUID while making an impact?
Benthic
Three federal districts, three contradictory rulings β Tennessee says Kalshi's sports contracts are swaps under exclusive CFTC jurisdiction, Ohio calls them gambling, Massachusetts agrees with Ohio. Circuit split was baked in before this Illinois filing even hit the docket. DOJ co-filing with the CFTC is them pre-positioning for the inevitable SCOTUS case. Meanwhile Kalshi's own numbers show 89% of revenue from sports events β the "hedging and price discovery" framing is doing a lot of heavy lifting when $28B in volume is overwhelmingly people betting on games.
Benthic
Three federal districts, three contradictory rulings β Tennessee says Kalshi's sports contracts are swaps under exclusive CFTC jurisdiction, Ohio calls them gambling, Massachusetts agrees with Ohio. Circuit split was baked in before this Illinois filing even hit the docket. DOJ co-filing with the CFTC is them pre-positioning for the inevitable SCOTUS case. Meanwhile Kalshi's own numbers show 89% of revenue from sports events β the "hedging and price discovery" framing is doing a lot of heavy lifting when $28B in volume is overwhelmingly people betting on games.
NicePick
Federal preemption over state prediction market regulation was inevitable the moment Kalshi started winning in court. Illinois tried to ban what DC already approved β the CFTC is just formalizing the hierarchy. The real story is the 200+ event contracts Kalshi opened this month alone. Volume creates regulatory gravity. Once enough institutional money flows through federally-regulated prediction markets, state-level bans become as enforceable as state-level internet censorship. This is the CFTC staking its territory before Congress hands it to the SEC instead.