Agentic commerce explodes as Visa, Stripe, and Coinbase race to power AI payments, but debate intensifies over whether crypto rails like x402 and MPP are truly necessary


8 recorded changes
Want your article here?
Promote with Leviathan News

8 recorded changes
Want your article here?
Promote with Leviathan NewsAgentic commerce – where AI “agents” autonomously browse, compare, and pay on behalf of users – is rapidly moving from concept to implementation, and major payments and crypto firms are now jockeying to define the underlying rails. Visa has introduced a Trusted Agent Protocol (TAP), a cryptographic scheme built on HTTP Message Signatures that lets merchants verify that an AI agent initiating a transaction is legitimate, acting for a real consumer, and carrying valid payment details. TAP is positioned as a “trust layer” for AI-led payments that works on existing card infrastructure rather than replacing it, aiming to help merchants distinguish trustworthy AI agents from malicious bots amid a reported 4,700% surge in AI-driven shopping traffic to U.S. retail sites over the past year. In parallel, Stripe and OpenAI have worked on an Agentic Commerce Protocol and other payment providers are exploring how to support “always-on” AI agents that negotiate prices, move funds, and transact across borders without human intervention. This has sharpened a debate over whether new crypto-native rails are needed, or whether existing card and bank infrastructure can simply be upgraded. Coinbase argues that agentic commerce will require real-time, autonomous, programmable payments and that stablecoin/crypto rails such as its proposed x402 and MPP (multi-party payments) are the only scalable path for AI agents transacting globally and around the clock. By contrast, banking infrastructure provider Increase contends that “the existing rails are best,” suggesting that the real leverage is exposing programmable, low-level access and better workflows on top of today’s systems rather than reinventing money movement. The result is a strategic race: incumbents like Visa and Stripe are trying to make current rails agent-ready, while crypto players like Coinbase push for fully on-chain, stablecoin-based architectures – a divergence that will shape how AI agents pay, which networks capture volume, and how much of this new commerce layer depends on crypto versus traditional payments. "entities":["Visa","Trusted Agent Protocol (TAP)","Stripe","OpenAI","Agentic Commerce Protocol","Coinbase","x402","MPP (multi-party payments)","stablecoins","Increase","Oscilar","Cloudflare","agentic commerce","AI agents","Visa card network"]}`
AI-generated background, compiled from web sources — not editorial content.
Loading related coverage…
Loading comments…
🚀 Love DeFi? Ready to dive in and start earning $SQUID while making an impact?

𝕏/@yield_xyz ·

𝕏/@blocks ·

𝕏/@CoinbaseDev ·

Coindesk ·

𝕏/@1inch ·

𝕏/@BNBCHAIN ·

𝕏/@yield_xyz ·

𝕏/@blocks ·

𝕏/@CoinbaseDev ·

Coindesk ·

𝕏/@1inch ·

𝕏/@BNBCHAIN ·
Danicjade
Whether they're necessary or not, agentic commerce is making its grounds and can't be stopped
Benthic
$28K daily volume on x402 and Artemis flags roughly half as wash trading — so we're looking at maybe $14K/day in organic agent-to-agent commerce backing a $7B "ecosystem" valuation that's 90% pre-existing LINK tokens. MPP shipping rail-agnostic from day one is the smarter play here: agents settle on stablecoins or Stripe cards depending on what the merchant accepts, which sidesteps the entire "do we need crypto rails" debate by just abstracting the rail away. Morgan Stanley's $385B agent commerce TAM by 2030 might be directionally right, but whoever captures it won't be the protocol that forces a single settlement layer — it'll be whoever makes the payment invisible to the agent, the way Stripe made it invisible to the developer.
Danicjade
Whether they're necessary or not, agentic commerce is making its grounds and can't be stopped