Introducing Project CUTTLE: Community Unified Token Treasury & Leviathan Emissions, a proposal for managing monthly emissions via vote of the SQUID DAO


9 recorded changes
Want your article here?
Promote with Leviathan News

9 recorded changes
Want your article here?
Promote with Leviathan NewsLeviathan News covers a new governance and emissions proposal for SQUID DAO called Project CUTTLE (Community Unified Token Treasury & Leviathan Emissions), which would give the DAO direct control over monthly token emissions via on-chain voting. The initiative is framed as an evolution of SQUID’s tokenomics and treasury management, aiming to align emissions, protocol growth, and community incentives under a more flexible, vote-driven framework. According to the proposal, Project CUTTLE introduces a mechanism where SQUID DAO tokenholders periodically decide how much of the protocol’s emissions are released and how they are allocated, rather than following a rigid, pre-set schedule. This is intended to let the DAO dynamically adjust incentives based on market conditions, treasury health, and strategic priorities, reflecting SQUID’s broader identity as a community-governed, crypto-native investment/treasury DAO that grew out of the Olympus-style reserve currency model. The CUTTLE framework also seeks to more tightly couple emissions decisions with the state and deployment of the DAO’s on-chain treasury, so that dilution, growth, and capital deployment are coordinated rather than treated as separate tracks. The story matters because it highlights how post-Olympus reserve-currency DAOs are experimenting with more sophisticated governance of emissions and treasuries, moving away from purely formulaic inflation toward explicitly governed “monetary policy.” For SQUID DAO, whose core value proposition is the management and growth of a sizable crypto treasury on behalf of tokenholders, the success or failure of Project CUTTLE will be an important test of whether actively governed emissions can improve capital efficiency, reduce wasteful dilution, and better align long-term holders, active participants, and protocol growth.
AI-generated background, compiled from web sources — not editorial content.
Loading related coverage…
Loading comments…

ꘜ/@leviathan_news ·

ꘜ/@leviathan_news ·

leviathan.news ·

digest.leviathannews.xyz ·

leviathan.news ·

leviathan.news ·

ꘜ/@leviathan_news ·

ꘜ/@leviathan_news ·

leviathan.news ·

digest.leviathannews.xyz ·

leviathan.news ·

leviathan.news ·
Robinhood Wallet adds Arcus RFQ system for swaps across 190+ tokenized stocks
The Block
Hyperliquid policy group urges EU to classify perpetual futures under MiFID II, not MiCA
𝕏/@HyperliquidPC
DPRK-linked attackers move $3.8M of Bitget exploit funds into ZEC shielded Ironwood pool
ꘜ/@investigations
Kelp DAO sues LayerZero and co-founder Bryan Pellegrino over rsETH bridge exploit
𝕏/@kelpdao
SBI Holdings completes Bitbank takeover, making the Japanese crypto exchange a wholly owned subsidiary
crypto.news
🚀 Love DeFi? Ready to dive in and start earning $SQUID while making an impact?
rozengarden.eth
So? do we ask for a specific threshold on the receiving safe ?
CurveCap
2/3 would be safest default, but having dealt with the challenges of operating multisigs I would be open to 1/3 with a good explanation
CurveCap
Thanks to the community for your feedback using the new comments feature, before we submit for a full vote
rozengarden.eth
So? do we ask for a specific threshold on the receiving safe ?
CurveCap
2/3 would be safest default, but having dealt with the challenges of operating multisigs I would be open to 1/3 with a good explanation