Quantum breakthroughs from Microsoft, Google & IBM suggest the long-promised tech is finally near, yet most firms are unprepared. Nvidia’s Jensen Huang now says quantum is at an “inflection point,” but corporate America risks a Blockbuster-vs-Netflix moment.

Quantum breakthroughs from Microsoft, Google & IBM suggest the long-promised tech is finally near, yet most firms are unprepared. Nvidia’s Jensen Huang now says quantum is at an “inflection point,” but corporate America risks a Blockbuster-vs-Netflix moment.
Qz
Revision history

4 recorded changes

Want your article here?

Promote with Leviathan News

Recent advances by Microsoft, Google, and IBM are convincing some industry leaders that practical quantum computing is moving out of the distant-future category and into a near-term strategic concern, but most large companies have not yet started serious planning, creating a risk of being blindsided when the technology matures. Over the past 18–24 months, major hardware milestones have accelerated expectations. Microsoft has unveiled its Majorana 1 quantum chip based on a new “Topological Core” architecture and a novel “topoconductor” material that it says can host more reliable, scalable qubits and ultimately scale to around a million qubits on a single chip capable of solving industrial problems in “years, not decades.” In parallel, Google and IBM have continued to push superconducting and neutral-atom approaches, with Google demonstrating improved quantum error correction and IBM publishing updated roadmaps for larger, more stable processors, while all three firms explore neutral-atom platforms as another route to “useful” machines. Together, these advances underpin Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang’s recent characterization of quantum as reaching an “inflection point,” where research prototypes are transitioning toward systems that enterprises will be able to access via cloud or as specialized accelerators alongside GPUs. Despite this momentum, surveys and expert commentary cited in the Qz piece indicate that most corporations remain at a very early stage: few have dedicated quantum teams, mapped relevant use cases (such as logistics optimization, portfolio risk, materials discovery, or cryptography), or assessed how quantum might disrupt their industry’s competitive dynamics. Analysts interviewed compare the situation to the Blockbuster vs. Netflix moment: incumbents that treat quantum as a distant science project may find themselves outpaced by competitors who start now with small proofs of concept, partnerships with cloud/quantum providers, and workforce upskilling. The story frames quantum not as an immediate replacement for classical or AI systems, but as a powerful complement that could, once mature, rapidly reshape certain high‑value computational tasks—making early strategic preparation a differentiator rather than speculative hype.

AI-generated background, compiled from web sources — not editorial content.

More coverage

Explore the topic

More on $NEAR

Comments