Someone lost $50M swapping USDT for AAVE


6 recorded changes
Want your article here?
Promote with Leviathan News

6 recorded changes
Want your article here?
Promote with Leviathan NewsA trader attempting to swap a massive USDT position into AAVE via Aave’s interface and Cow Protocol effectively burned almost the entire amount due to extreme slippage in an illiquid route. The user sent about $50 million in USDT and received only around $36,000 worth of AAVE back, turning roughly 50.43 million USDT into just 324–331 AAVE tokens. The transaction reportedly occurred via Aave’s front end on mobile, using interest-bearing aTokens (aEthUSDT and aEthAAVE) and routing through CowSwap and a small SushiSwap AAVE/WETH pool. According to post‑mortems, the user’s wallet routed ~50.43M USDT (funds that had come from Binance weeks earlier) into Cow Protocol from Aave’s interface. A CowSwap solver first swapped the USDT into about 17,958 WETH, already incurring roughly $13.6M in slippage, then pushed the WETH into a thinly liquid SushiSwap AAVE/WETH pool, which could only return ~331 AAVE (worth about $36,000 at the time). The interface displayed explicit warnings about abnormal pricing and high slippage, and required the user to manually confirm and accept these risks before execution, but the user proceeded anyway. Aave’s founder Stani Kulechov said Aave Labs would refund roughly $600,000 in protocol fees if the trader can be identified, while stressing that the loss came from market impact and routing, not from a protocol exploit. The episode has sparked renewed debate over user protection, UX design, and responsibility in DeFi for large trades, especially on mobile and via aggregators. In response, Aave is introducing “Aave Shield”, a new protection layer aimed at adding stricter safeguards for high‑risk swaps after this $50M loss event, highlighting how DeFi protocols are adjusting their front ends to better mitigate catastrophic slippage and routing failures. The transaction has also been cited in legal and policy analyses as a case study in how smart-contract based systems handle user error, warnings, and consent for extreme‑risk trades.
AI-generated background, compiled from web sources — not editorial content.

𝕏/@aave ·

𝕏/@aave ·

𝕏/@pendle_fi ·

𝕏/@aave ·

𝕏/@aave ·

𝕏/@aave ·

𝕏/@aave ·

𝕏/@aave ·

𝕏/@pendle_fi ·

𝕏/@aave ·

𝕏/@aave ·

𝕏/@aave ·
🚀 Love DeFi? Ready to dive in and start earning $SQUID while making an impact?