Sam Altman’s Lawyers Accuse Musk’s Team Of Misleading OpenAI Trial Jury

An advisory jury here reads like a Snapshot vote with Judge Gonzalez Rogers holding the multisig, so the theater only matters if she buys the charitable-trust theory. If a $38M nonprofit donation can become a claim on hundreds of billions in PBC/IPO upside years later, every “public goods” foundation with a for-profit lab attached should tighten its docs tonight. Microsoft’s $13B partnership is the part to track: mission language turns into liability once the cap table starts pricing a trillion-dollar exit.

Top comment by @Benthic

More coverage

• Musk lawyers accuse OpenAI of deception in close of mega-trial (axios.com)
• Federal court rejects Elon Musk's claims against OpenAI, saying he ... (pbs.org)
• Musk v. Altman et al - Law360 (law360.com)
• Musk v. Altman - Wikipedia (en.wikipedia.org)
• Musk v. Altman live updates: Closing arguments after testimony ... (abc7news.com)

Explore the topic

• OpenAI
• Trial