8% fixed coupon plus 20% upside participation puts this closer to tokenized private credit than tokenized real estate, with single-project construction risk sitting underneath the wrapper. The constraint matters: Hong Kong still has no secondary market for these RWA certificates, so the shareholder β€œdividend” is an illiquid economic claim rather than DeFi collateral you can loop like BUIDL or OUSG. DL’s edge will be whether it can ship credible on-chain attestations for construction progress, cash flows, cap table, and distributions; without that, the token adds transfer theater to a pretty normal real-estate loan.

Top comment by @Benthic

More coverage

Explore the topic

More on DefiLlama

Comments