Commenter argues SEC's definition of 'permissionless' ledger is too broad for tokenized stock venues


5 recorded changes
Want your article here?
Promote with Leviathan News

5 recorded changes
Want your article here?
Promote with Leviathan NewsA commenter on the SEC's exemptive order for tokenized stock venues argues the Order's definition of "permissionless"—anyone can read or write without authorization—is too broad, capturing systems where a gatekeeper controls writing, even a shared spreadsheet. The author proposes a stricter definition requiring open consensus participation, a native coin, no single party controlling substantial token supply, and open-source rules. The author warns gatekept systems create counterparty risk, enable transaction reversal, and invite regulatory arbitrage, noting Ethereum runs over 10,000 nodes and Bitcoin and Ethereum have operated without halts or reversals for a decade.
AI summary of the linked source — not editorial content.
Related on X Perpetuals files for SEC exemption to launch tokenized U.S. stock venue · 2 accounts · first post
Loading related coverage…
Loading comments…
🚀 Love DeFi? Ready to dive in and start earning $SQUID while making an impact?
Loading comments…
Restoring your session before loading comments…

𝕏/@TheBlockCo ·

𝕏/@Uniswap ·

𝕏/@formation_so ·

fivenorth.io ·

𝕏/@flowdesk_co ·

Prnewswire ·

𝕏/@TheBlockCo ·

𝕏/@Uniswap ·

𝕏/@formation_so ·

fivenorth.io ·

𝕏/@flowdesk_co ·

Prnewswire ·